-->
Showing posts with label Bret Allain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bret Allain. Show all posts

Friday, June 06, 2014

Everything you need to know about the lawsuit bill

Lamar has you covered.

That is a comprehensive article by Lamar. It doesn't miss a beat. But perhaps its most crucial observation comes here.
Oil and gas industry attorneys weren’t merely “involved;” they wrote the bill. According to those who were there, lobbyists and lawyers for BP seemed to play an outsized role.

Earlier tonight, John Barry, the former chairman of the SLFPA-E and the internationally acclaimed author of Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America, told me, “A lot of people mentioned to me how omnipresent BP lobbyists were, more than the other major oil companies were (though all of them showed plenty of interest), so much more that it got a lot of people wondering, ‘What’s in the bill for them?’ It certainly got us wondering.”

I also spoke with State Representative John Bel Edwards, who echoed Mr. Barry’s concerns. Oil and gas lobbyists already knew Representative Edwards was opposed to the legislation, he said. They didn’t even waste their time trying to convince him otherwise. But lobbyists, particularly lobbyists associated with BP, spent a lot of time with some of his colleagues.

When the Attorney General expressed his doubts about the bill earlier this week, the reaction of Jindal's legislative allies who pushed it through appeared to indicate that they had only a vague conception what was in the bill in the first place. Robert Adley and Bret Allain's comments basically boil down to, "Well why didn't you tell us any of this stuff before?" Now we know why that is.  Most of our legislators don't seem to really know or care what they're doing beyond just following orders.

Wednesday, April 09, 2014

Wouldn't this be a bigger waste of taxpayer money?

Going through the trouble of holding elections whose results are invalidated by a turnout threshold seems more expensive than just passing a tax that at least buys the voters whatever thing they might have passed but what do I know?
The most controversial measure comes courtesy of state Sen. Bret Allain, R-Franklin, who wants lawmakers to pass a constitutional amendment that would force local governments and political subdivisions to adhere to new guidelines for tax elections. The coming debate could be a barnburner, pitting the business lobby against school boards, parish councils, police juries, mayors and other local entities.

Allain’s Senate Bill 200 would require a minimum turnout of 20 percent of active voters to validate a local tax election. Under Allain’s measure, even if a tax were to pass with no opposing votes, the ballot wouldn’t count if turnout was one vote less than the proposed threshold. “If we’re going to take people’s hard-earned money, there should be a higher standard,” Allain said.

He contends local governments often schedule tax referenda during off-elections, where there are no high-profile races on the ballot and turnout will be low. “That ends up costing taxpayers more when they do that,” he said. “They pay huge amounts of money to participate in off-elections.”

Last month, when the Orleans Parish runoffs for sheriff and City Council were on the ballot alongside three tax proposals, turnout was 25 percent. In February, when the mayor’s race topped the ballot with six other tax questions, turnout was 35 percent. The last time Orleans saw a ballot with only propositions on it was in July 2008, when four property tax proposals produced a turnout of roughly 5 percent. 
But, if you are going to do this, you might as well hold to your principle and go the whole nine yards with it.  I might be persuaded, for example, by a law that invalidates ANY election result if the turnout is less than  50% of eligible voters. Make them all keep running until we get some kind of consensus.

We might end up having to cancel some parades and stuff, according to some people.
Low voter turnout in key precincts as well as Williams winning the early voting was too much for her campaign to overcome, Hedge-Morrell said.

"In key areas I did really well in (the primary) we dropped 50 percent in turnout," Hedge-Morrell said referring to the Upper 9th Ward and parts of Gentilly and eastern New Orleans.

She cited the St. Patrick's Day festivities as one reason for the low turnout.

"How do we get people to realize you can go to the St. Patrick's parade but you can vote first," Hedge-Morrell said. "It's hard to engage people with the seriousness of the issues we're dealing with. How do we get these people re-engaged?"