On Friday, Vance declared that "undisputed evidence" shows the 13 judges of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court have "a policy or practice of not inquiring into criminal defendants' ability to pay before those individuals are imprisoned for nonpayment of court debts."So a lot depends on how they decide to do that.
She also declared that the judges have an "institutional conflict of interest" in making such poverty determinations themselves.
That's because the proceeds from fines and fees go directly to the court's Judicial Expense Fund, a kitty controlled by the judges that can be used for a broad range of judicial expenses. Fines and fees have contributed about $1 million a year to the court's coffers.
Vance ruled that the court's failure to "provide a neutral forum for determination of such persons' ability to pay is unconstitutional."
The decision appears to leave it up to the court to decide how to set up a mechanism for such decisions.
Monday, August 06, 2018
Okay so what is a "neutral hearing"?
This looks like a pretty good ruling in the "debtors's prison" lawsuit. (Basically, it says Orleans Parish operates one and that is bad and we shouldn't do that.)But it still isn't clear what the remedy is.