-->
Showing posts with label Charlie Melancon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlie Melancon. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 03, 2010

I called it backwards

As it stands at a little after midnight, it's looking like +65 or more in the House and +6 or 7 in the Senate. So I overestimated the Senate gains (by a little) and underestimated the House gains (by a little).

Democrats deserve the loss. From the beginning of this Congress (and this Presidential term) they've consistently sought out the most cowardly ways to accomplish the least anyone could possibly hope for given their numerical advantages and electoral mandate going in. They suck. It's tragic that real people suffer because Democrats suck but what can we say? This is the way of things.

David Vitter defeats Charlie Melancon. For some unknown reason, NOLA.com has labeled this a "remarkable comeback". Please, someone remind me when the Vitter campaign was hopelessly down in the polls during this election. At what point did anyone think that Melancon, or anyone like him, had any shot at unseating Vitter? Sure, the soon-to-be-second-term junior Senator has had to endure a prolonged media circus over his colorful and hypocritical escapades in the sex trade. But those "serious sins" never seriously threatened his political career. Not even for a moment. Not even in July 2007, as the Wendy Cortez story was breaking, did Vitter look beatable. Please indulge me as I quote my own observations from this YRHT thread posted on 7/24/2007 (I've combined three separate comments minus a few lines that only make sense in the context of the conversation)
Vitter's not leaving. He's not really all that damaged politically.

I'm not kidding. He doesn't have many friends in state politics.. not even among Republicans. But that just means he's hard-headed enough to resist the pressure to resign. If he hangs on, he'll be strong enough again by 2010 to be reelected.... particularly if a Democrat wins the Presidential race in 2008.

I think David Vitter is very much in line with the current political zeitgeist of stubborn denial of responsibility. Regardless of facts, he won't back down. Like Nagin, like Jefferson, like Bush, like Gonzales and.. you name it, Vitter will continue to lie and lie and blame his "enemies" as long as necessary.

Once reelection time comes around, the issue will be that GOP held seat of his and an opportunity for a more staunchly Republican Louisiana than ever to defy whatever weak-ass Democrat is sitting in the White House.


I know. Uncanny prescience, right? Remember, though, I am not a witch. I am you.

The 2nd Congressional District lived up to its dismal reputation this year presenting voters with yet another election between two despicable phonies and the horrible horrible establishment political types backing their campaigns. This campaign also became a proxy war of sorts between local muckraking blogger Dambala and professional political reporters at the Times Picayune and Gambit who appear to have intentionally misrepresented his allegations against Cedric Richmond in order to discredit them. I know that's a strong statement for me to make without intending to go too far into detail right now. But please read this post where Dambala responds to some of what appeared in the T-P last month. Note the constant focus from the pro reporters on the Rolex question (which they get wrong anyway) instead of on the larger issue of the "Con-Profit" story Dambala was and is still developing. Note also a similar fixation on the Rolex from Clancy Dubos in a Gambit column about this race written shortly afterward. I think these journalists are doing this on purpose partially to snipe at the amateur media and partially because it's just in their nature to protect the political establishment. Both the Gambit and the T-P went out of their way to pair and conflate Dambala's work with the paid political hackery of the Cao campaign's own internet rumor mongering although those two things are clearly not related and easily distinguished from one another.

Richmond's win isn't an easy thing to get excited about but it at least means that voters in the 2nd District know their Representative's vote will be more likely to reflect their actual interests during the next Congress. This stands in contrast to the situation with the outgoing Congressman who repeatedly insulted his constituents by voting against the (admittedly weak) health care reform act and the Lilly Ledbetter Act to name a couple. We know that Stacy Head and Erroll Williams presented a further insult to 2nd District voters by asking them to continue to forfeit their Congressional representation in order to satisfy Ms Head's and Mr. Williams' vanity and/or warped priorities. Cedric Richmond may be an asshole but, if you're a Democrat and you supported Joseph Cao, you're a bigger asshole. And the scene of perpetual feud between assholes and bigger assholes about sums up things in this district.

Jay Dardenne is going to be the Lieutenant Governor. I didn't vote for him, but I'm kind of excited about it anyway because I can't help but feel a little good about seeing a political heiress Junior Leaguer waste of space like Caroline Fayard get crushed. Also Dardenne is among Dambala's next targets which should make for an interesting next few years.

Anyway, it's 2:00 now and I'm packing it in. If you're having trouble sleeping maybe you can try counting (or possibly recounting) the Colorado votes until you nod off.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Who are you and what have you done with Charlie Melancon?

It's strategically pointless to wait until the garbage time of the final days of a campaign to come out swinging, but Melancon demonstrated in tonight's WWLTV debate that he at least knows how a person might theoretically run a successful race against David Vitter if a person... even a person as generally lame as Charlie Melancon... wanted to do that.

Watch this debate. It just gets better as it goes along.

Part 1

Part 2

Part3

Part 4

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Oh my

Senator Vitter and his chivalrous band of knights continue to make merry.
A trusted aide to Louisiana Sen. David Vitter resigned Wednesday morning after ABC News reported that he had been arrested for attacking his ex-girlfriend with a knife, and had an open warrant for his arrest in Baton Rouge on a drunk driving charge. The aide, Brent Furer, worked on the Republican senator's last campaign, and has spent the last five years posted in his Washington office to handle, among other things, women's issues.


via Adrastos' First-Draft gig

Despite his well-publicized issues with fidelity and prostitution and such Vitter leads Melancon 46-34 among women in this recent PPP poll (PDF) That's 20% undecided for those of you who like counting. But I don't expect this to move the numbers much. There are too many other things going on and I have doubts about any Louisiana Democrat's ability to capitalize on an opponent's weakness.

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

This is also more like it

Although not quite there yet
Louisiana Rep. Charlie Melancon (D) on Wednesday called for the firing of BP CEO Tony Hayward in the wake of the massive Gulf oil spill.
Calling for Hayward to be fired is a good start but Billy Nungesser has a better idea.
Nungesser said he can't believe what Hayward is saying about the spill. Despite what scientists from several universities are saying, Hayward on Monday said there's no evidence of large masses of oil under the surface in the Gulf of Mexico, citing oil's natural tendency to rise to the top. "I'd like to (take) him offshore, dunk him under the surface of the water, pull him up with that black gooey stuff on him and have him say, 'Our research shows no oil beneath the surface. It's all coming to the top,'" Nungesser said.

Friday, January 29, 2010

"Obnoxious and legally unsustainable"

Shit, yeah! Never in my life did I ever think I'd say Give 'em hell, Vitty! but there it is.


Roger Goodell, Commissioner
National Football League
280 Park Avenue, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10017


Dear Commissioner Goodell:

I was stunned to learn recently that the NFL is taking the position that it owns the exclusive trademark of the term "Who Dat" and has even threatened legal action against some mom-and-pop merchants selling t-shirts using the term. I would urge you to drop this obnoxious and legally unsustainable position and instead agree that "Who Dat" is in the public domain, giving no one exclusive trademark rights.

This letter will also serve as formal legal notice that I am having t-shirts printed that say "WHO DAT say we can't print Who Dat!" for widespread sale in commerce. Please either drop your present ridiculous position or sue me.

"Who Dat" was probably first heard in New Orleans minstrel shows well over 130 years ago. Much more recently, but before it was used in connection with the Saints, it was used as a rallying cry by St. Augustine High School in New Orleans. In the 1980s it was adopted by Saints fans in a completely spontaneous way. Only later did any legal persons, including the Saints and the NFL, try to claim it through registration.

Perhaps more significant than this history, "Who Dat" has become part of New Orleans and Louisiana popular culture. For the NFL to try to claim exclusive ownership of it would be like me registering and trying to claim exclusive ownership of the terms "lagniappe" and "laissez les bons temps rouler!"

Under Paul Tagliabue's leadership, the NFL was an unbelievable partner in helping us recover and rebuild after Hurricane Katrina. Thank you again. We look forward to your dropping your "Who Dat" position so that this partnership can continue without strain or blemish.

Sincerely,

David Vitter
Junior Senator of Who Dat Nation


Update: Vitter's likely Dem opponent in 2010, Rep. Charlie Melancon has put up a petition on his website asking the NFL to "leave our fans alone!"

Once again, nothing brings people together like Saints football.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Melancon is officially in

At this point, it doesn't look like anyone can take down Vitty and I expect he'll find a way to make this even more difficult than it needs to be but, for various reasons, Charlie Melancon has no choice but to do this.

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

"And the reason for it, sir, is we do get a lot of misinformation."


Congressman Melancon shows Bob Delgiorno how to claim the Nigerian Prince's fortune while signing up for free cell phone service and enhancing his man parts all in one tweet.


This morning on WWL radio, Bob DelGiorno hosted Congressman Charlie Melancon for a discussion about the state of health care reform legislation currently before Congress. Melancon is a member of the Blue Dog coalition who recently voted against part of the legislation in committee. Delgiorno is a loud clown of a man who has made a career of throwing his unabashed ignorance into competition with his faux outrage to see which one can generate the biggest brightest stupidnova of any given morning.

I've transcribed a few highlights of the conversation between the two men, one a news and information professional and the other a U.S. Congressmen, as they grappled with the complexities of accessing pending legislation. (Audio here. Transcribed conversation picks up around minute 37:00)

Bob: Do you have this bill HR 3200 in nice binding... all thousands of pages or so? Why can't the general public get access? I went to Housegov.com [ EDITOR'S NOTE: "housegov.com" is not an actual website] I clicked on bills. I went to HR 3200. I went to the American Affordable Health Choices Act 2009 and I got ring-around-the-rosie. I had to put all this information together to go -- go to committees and comments... why can't we look at that bill? WHY CAN'T THE TAXPAYERS LOOK AT THAT BILL?

Melancon: Bob, as far as I know you can.

Bob: How?

Melancon: Well I'd have to ask my staff. I don't get on the computer all day. As a matter of fact I'm never by my computer all day. But they can get copies and know were to go and what...

Bob: But WE DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GO! And we want to find out where we can look at it.

Melancon: That's what I want to do for you.

Bob: And the reason for it, sir, is we do get a lot of misinformation.

Melancon: Sure and one of the things and please give this out.

[Melancon recommends "www.politifacts.com" (yes he spelled it out) as a "non-partisan web site" that sorts out "myths and facts" It is not.]*

Bob: But still back to the question, why can't we get on the internet and get HR 3200? Tell me how to do it! How do we do it?

Melancon: I don't know. I'll get my staff...

Bob: CAN THEY LET US KNOW?

Melancon: I'll get my staff to email to you the address where you go to get the bill. And if there's some difficulty getting the bill downloaded from the site... whatever it is.. please let us know because I want government to be responsible...

Bob: So when are you gonna get this information so I can pass it on to my listeners?


Melancon promised he would have "my staff" email the appropriate information to DelGiorno later. But since Melancon is "never at my computer" and DelGiorno is a blithering idiot, I can't imagine that operation will go off very efficiently. Bob has a lot of spam to click though in between his obsessive refreshes of "housegov.com."

During the next hour, Bob updated us on the state of things. Obviously Melancon's staff had not yet emailed.

He's gonna send me all this information on how to access this bill. They get a nice binder and we gotta get on the internet and just go crazy trying to get all this information and verify the crap we get... you know.. what's true what's not true.


Here's what's true. HR 3200 is available online. I'll get you there in one click, if you like.

What's also true is that if Bob were to find the bill, it would be the most disappointing development of the day for him. It would invalidate his smug insinuation that it's being hidden from his view for some devious purpose. Worse than that, he might even feel obligated to read it. And that would suck since, as we all know, it's not Bob's job to actually read and understand the bill... or read summaries of the bill... or read any reliably sourced piece of news about the bill. All he's paid to do is shout about it on the radio. Although I can't imagine why WWL continues to agree to such an arrangement.

* Clarification: I feel a little bad about not pointing out that the Congressman was obviously referencing the site politifact.com however that isn't what he said.