The lawsuit does not discuss or dispute the specifics of that incident, instead focusing on the newspaper’s use of the word “arrest” and asserting that he was never arrested. The allegation that he was arrested “is injurious to Scurlock’s personal and professional reputation,” the suit says.
Monday, July 20, 2020
Okay well thanks for pointing that out
Frank wants everyone to know that he was not arrested but instead only cited for lewd conduct in the back of an Uber in Los Angeles in 2018. It is very important that we, as we now recall the various other details of that incident which many of had put out of our minds, that we remember this one fact in particular.
Labels:
Frank Scurlock,
media,
New Orleans
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment