In most of the country, Labor Day Weekend is where we make the psychic turn from summer to fall, even if the calendar doesn't quite yet agree. In Louisiana, September is a liar. School is back in session. Football has kicked off. The Halloween decorations have been up at Rouses for weeks now. But outside, the heat and humidity remain. And, of course, Hurricane Season moves into its most active period. The August 29 date marks not just the anniversary of Katrina, but also Isaac and Ida, so the seasonal transition can be an especially traumatic one. This year the temporal ecotone delivers us into peak storm season from the most brutal heat most of us have experienced in our lifetimes. The state is still so hot and dry that the Governor is warning people not to fire up the grill for the holiday. We'll see how that goes.
Meanwhile, as we head into the marquee part of Hurricane Season, the Washington Post greets us with a predictably depressing update on Louisiana's sinking coastline.
A
group of scientists at Tulane University have also been investigating
the situation. They found that across more than 200 wetland monitoring stations, seas are almost always rising faster than wetlands are able to grow — meaning that most wetlands are in a state of “drowning.” Their work, which is unpublished, tracked changes between 2009 and 2021.
“The
number of the ‘drowning’ sites is much more than I thought before I
started” the research, said Guandong Li, a PhD student at Tulane who led
the work. “About 90 percent of these sites are unable to keep up with
this recent high rate of sea level rise.”
"In a state of drowning." I'm petitioning for a bill next year that let's me buy a license plate with, "The Drowning State" printed on it. Anyway, we know this information all too well now. The current effort to protect and rebuild the coast is proving to be no match for accelerating sea level rise.
Sea level rise is driven both by land sinking — or
subsidence — and the rising of the ocean. In the case of the current
Gulf Coast surge, research suggests it is occurring in regions with and without major subsidence, implying a dominant role for the ocean.
The faster seas rise, the less effective the state’s widely praised plans to protect its coast will be.
In 2012, Louisiana projected that,
if sea level rise and other environmental threats remain modest, it
would be able to rebuild land within 50 years. But a new plan released this year
assumes faster sea level rise more consistent with current trends and
shows considerable land losses by late this century — even in more
optimistic scenarios.
“Over the period of 10 years, the state has gone from potentially being
in a net gain situation to potentially being in [a] very significant net
loss situation,” said Alex Kolker, a coastal geologist with the
Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. “And that’s despite the best
efforts of some very dedicated people.”
Those "best efforts" Kolker is talking about end up being cancelled out by all the carbon bombs
In 2016, the U.S. exported its first tanker of liquified natural gas,
or LNG, from Cheniere’s Energy’s Sabine Pass terminal in Cameron
Parish. Since then, fossil fuel firms have built four more export
terminals in the Gulf South with plans for 20 more. Even before the
terminals were built, the initial emissions estimates to regulators were
so alarming that some environmental advocates described the planned
facilities as “carbon bombs.”
Now, it seems that the reality is more grim than the predictions. All
five of the active LNG export terminals in the Gulf South have leaked
pollutants. People who live near the export terminals say the facilities
are belching higher levels of toxic and climate-warming pollution into
the air than originally estimated – which threatens the air quality of
communities already burdened by pollution.
For example, Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass export facility, in
south Louisiana, exceeded hourly emissions limits of its air permits more than 100 times in 2022,
according to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, which
sent the company a consolidated compliance order in June, warning that
fines were possible.
Industry marketing campaigns
tout natural gas as a “cleaner” alternative, because burning it
produces about half as much carbon dioxide as coal, to generate the same
amount of energy. But leaks and emissions can erase those benefits,
because natural gas is primarily composed of methane, the potent
greenhouse gas.
It's a real boom in these bombs. It makes me a little bit sentimental for the days of the Bobby Jindal regime when the Wall Street Journal heralded the coming of "Qatar on the Bayou." At that time, Louisiana's industrial tax credit subsidies promised to bestow on us gleaming corridors of "fertilizer plants, boron manufacturers, methanol terminals, polymer
plants, ammonia factories and paper-finishing facilities," up and down the Mississippi. That article (yes it's paywalled but trust me) featured commentary from the fossil industry's resident.. uh.. fossil in Louisiana, economist Loren Scott who promised that once the 10 year tax breaks expired, our school districts would "find themselves with a bonanza" on their hands. But fast-forward to this year and Louisiana public schools are seeing crashing enrollments, a drain on public funding that benefits private schools, and a superintendent who panders to the hate groups coordinating book bans. Some bonanza.
Nevermind the formal education, though. Louisiana is more proud of its entrepreneurial spirit anyway. Just look at these creative solutions we're applying so we can make real progress here in 2023, the hottest year on record.
Instead of lowering their emissions, two Gulf Coast LNG facilities,
one in Louisiana and one in Texas, have asked state officials to make
the situation right by increasing the amount of pollution they are
permitted to spew into the air.
All together, in the United States, 25 planned projects to expand and
build new export terminals will produce more than 90 million tons of
greenhouse gasses annually, according to “Playing with Fire: the Climate
Impact of the Rapid Growth of LNG,” a 2022 report from the Environmental Integrity Project that based its conclusions on the projected emissions given to regulators before the facilities were granted permits.
“That’s almost as much climate-warming pollution as 18 million passenger vehicles running for a year,” the report noted.
But uh oh. There's trouble brewing, says this Times-Picayune article. The precious boom in carbon bombs might be slowing down as the market becomes saturated. You might think it's time to rein the established players back in on all that methane and CO2 they're allowed to blow off into the air. You'd be wrong, though. We're doing this instead.
The Lower Energy Costs Act
— which aims to speed up environmental review processes for LNG
terminals and other energy projects, among myriad issues — passed the
Republican-led House earlier this year but hasn’t moved in the
Democrat-controlled Senate. The legislation was spearheaded by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Republican Rep. Garret Graves, both of Louisiana.
Loosening the regulatory burden would help
the smaller projects that can’t handle lengthy reviews, though it would
further exacerbate environmental risks for Louisiana’s Gulf Coast,
Slocum said.
“If you remove that FERC regulatory process, and you
allow some of these smaller scale facilities to basically just take your
local zoning board out for a steak dinner and you got yourself your
building permit and you can start construction the next day and you can
finish it in 12 months, obviously that’s a big advantage,” Slocum said.
Critics of Scalise and Graves's bill have been calling it the "Polluters over People Act" (missing an obvious opportunity to call it the Steak Dinner for Polluters Act.) It would place limits on the time and resources available to federal regulators charged with approving or rejecting fossil fuel infrastructure projects. It would also limit the law's ability to protect communities from the inevitable harm these facilities produce.
Such inevitable harm includes the 360 wildfires currently raging across the state due to an unprecedented drought brought on by fossil fuel driven climate change. It also would include a different kind of fire set off at the Marathon Refinery last week in St. John Parish, itself only the latest example of the tons of toxic chemicals released into Louisiana's air and water each year. And of course who could forget the even more desecrated and faster sinking coastline wrought by all of this activity as well.
But the consequences of the boom are most visible on the Gulf Coast, mostly on the rural fringes of the Louisiana coast.
Grist reviewed dozens of state and federal records, and found that,
even as regulators from state agencies like the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ) hasten to greenlight new terminals, the
handful of terminals that have begun operation are exposing residents of
coastal parishes to dangerous levels of air pollution from flares and
leaks.
Louisiana environmental regulators recently cited numerous violations
at Venture Global’s LNG terminal in Cameron Parish in southwestern
Louisiana. But five hours away, on the southeastern edge of the state,
they are allowing the company to move forward with the Delta LNG plant
near McAnespy’s home in Plaquemines.
In places like Plaquemines, gas exporters are building their plants
on eroding swampland, where there is an increased risk of catastrophic
accidents and explosions during floods and hurricanes. People like
McAnespy, who live in neighborhoods surrounding the terminals, are right
in the blast zone.
“It’s not just that each of these facilities is like a giant death
star on sinking land, it’s that there’s so many of them,” said Elizabeth
Calderon, a senior attorney at the environmental nonprofit Earthjustice
who has worked on cases challenging LNG terminals in south Louisiana.
“This is how sacrifice zones are created,” she said.
And there's Louisiana 2023 in a nutshell. For the mere price of a few well placed steak dinners, you can deploy your very own Death Star to carbon bomb our sacrifice zone.
But anyone can tell you there's a ton of money to be made in wartime for the savvy investor regardless of which side is actually winning. And why should the war on climate change be any different? Insurers understand this. They're already planning to win the next battle. There might not be much of a future in writing policies for homeowners in South Louisiana or Florida.. or California. You know what you can insure, though? More Death Stars.
The companies no longer insuring Louisiana homes are well-known, but those insuring LNG terminals are not. Government agencies require proof of insurance for fossil fuel projects, but those documents are often shielded from the public as developers claim confidential business information exemptions, even going to court to prevent insurers’ names from becoming public.
In early June, anti-fossil fuel campaign Insure Our Future got a rare look into one gas export terminal in Texas: Freeport LNG. First published in E&E News, Freeport’s insurers are largely specialty or reinsurance companies, but a few are also involved in the property market, including Liberty Mutual, AIG and Chubb.
Most insurers and LNG companies contacted for this story – including AIG, Chubb, Liberty Mutual, and Venture Global – either declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment. While no insurance information for terminals in coastal Louisiana has become public, their insurers are likely to come from similar kinds of companies.
Oil and gas projects along the Gulf Coast have long been “a major market” for specialty insurance carriers, Keenan says.
This is how climate policy is formulated. Insurers, and investment capital firms are making decisions about what is viable. Such decisions carry massive impacts for ordinary people but allow them no input beyond their limited role as consumers. And, in accordance with the dictates of our capital de-risking matrix, anyone who can't afford the increasing costs of living along a sinking coast of a rising sea is allowed to fall off and fail on an
isolated individual basis. Political factors, we are told, has no consideration here. Most convenient for elected policymakers, these problems are all off their desks. The real choices are abstracted away to private investors and explained simply as market determinants.
And the market has determined that we do not need to invest in sustainable equitable and healthy communities in order to generate profit. Those things, we can happily sacrifice in the fire or in the flood, whichever comes first. The net effect is a re-calibration of who and what can survive where. In this way, New Orleans becomes a boutique resort where nobody actually lives. Grand Isle can "boom" but only as an exclusive fishing camp for millionaires. And towns all up and down the bayou can be swallowed whole by extractive industry.
Now here is where we have to remind ourselves not to go too far overboard with the "market decides" rhretoric. Remember, we're supposed to be moving past neoliberalism. We're doing something called "Bidenomics" now. But mostly what that means is we are seeking the same sorts of policy outcomes as before but being slightly more explicit about the fact there's intention behind the program. Did you know, for example, that Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act "includes a bonanza for the carbon capture industry?" That's what this headline says, anyway. And, hey, there's that "bonanza" word again. As we've already seen, that can only mean one thing. More massive state subsidies for environmentally damaging heavy industry.
The Inflation Reduction Act,
which passed the Senate on Monday and is poised to pass the House on
Friday, includes a dramatic change in a crucial tax credit for the
carbon capture industry—increasing the government subsidy for capturing
CO2 from polluting sources from $50 to $85 per metric ton. Developers
say that raising that incentive could tip many projects that once
weren’t worth the investment over the financial finish line. The new
bill also simplifies the process for receiving those tax credits, and
opens the subsidy to smaller carbon capture projects, which together
essentially fulfill a full industry wishlist for new carbon capture
legislation.
“The fact that [the legislation] actually happened isn’t a big
surprise,” says Adrian Corless, CEO of CarbonCapture, a direct air
capture startup. “The fact that it actually came out in such a good form
and actually came out [so soon] is much better than we expected.”
What Democratic Party political consultants mean for us to get from this is the Biden Administration is directing a bold new industrial policy that fights climate change. What's actually happening, is much less impressive. In practice, Biden's initiatives are working out about as well for Louisiana as Bobby Jindal's program of industrial expansion did. Consider that most carbon capture projects are "greenwashing" exercises. That is to say they are an elaborate token mitigation measure that allows polluting industries to carry on with business as usual.
CCS does not do a good job of capturing and storage carbon. It
struggles to exist, and when it does, it struggles to function. When it
manages both, all it does is capture a tiny fraction of high-emitting
process, supplying or burning fossil fuels, and the carbon it captures
gets sent straight back to work worsening the climate crisis by jimmying
the last dregs of oil from depleted reservoirs.
On top of all of this, it serves a rhetorical function; worsening the climate problem through the empty promise it provides.
And it's working. Joe Biden's carbon capture "empty promise" is enabling new projects in Louisiana. A gas company called Air Products has, over the objections of local residents, already begun drilling a carbon pipeline that would inject waste material deep beneath Lake Maurepas. Already they seem to have imploded a groundwater well in the process. All of the new LNG carbon bombs and Death Stars are enabled by carbon capture promises as well. Maybe we're not quite ready to declare the next Qatar on the Bayou but you can see where we're going.
Perhaps the biggest boondoggle in all of this, though, are so-called "direct air capture" projects like this one in Calcasieu Parish.
Louisiana will receive up to $603 million in Department of Energy
grant funding to create a direct air capture hub in Calcasieu Parish
that is expected to generate about 2,300 total jobs, federal officials
said.
Dubbed Project Cypress, the direct air capture hub will
attempt to pull more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide annually
directly from the atmosphere and sequester it deep underground,
according to the Department of Energy.
No it won't. It will not do any of that. In the above cited article, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm enthuses that direct air capture projects are like “giant vacuums that can suck decades of old carbon pollution straight out of the sky.” In reality, they are ineffective net energy consumers likely to produce at least as much carbon as they could ever remove. Ten days after the above article praising the supposed 2300 jobs (100 permanent jobs max) promised by Project Cypress, the T-P followed up with this explainer where we learn the dubious process is "like trying to mop the ocean."
It is “a little bit like trying to mop the ocean,” said Jane Patton,
plastics and petrochemicals campaigns manager at the Center for
International Environmental Law.
Patton noted that Louisiana emitted somewhere between 211 million and
219 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2018, according to LSU’s most
recent greenhouse gas inventory. At best, Project Cypress will sequester 1 million tons annually.
“We’re talking about a very big planet here and very small filtration mechanisms,” she said.
Patton
said prior direct air capture pilot programs have missed their carbon
dioxide sequestration goals while using more energy than promised. In
addition, the filtration systems rely on amines and ethylene oxide,
which are “very toxic.”
Patton is also wary of the injection
aspect of both direct air capture and carbon capture, which requires
liquefying carbon dioxide, transporting it via pipeline and injecting it
deep under cap rocks within Louisiana’s “sinking geology,” as she put
it.
“That has not been proven to work reliably anywhere in the world at the scale that industry is promising,” Patton said.
The very toxic inefficient process that has not been proven to work might not be good for de-carbonization. But, as we've already seen, that's really beside the point. The Bidenomics bonanza here is in real estate.
Ohio-based Battelle will be the project owner and will partner with Climeworks Corp. and Heirloom Carbon Technologies Inc. to develop the sequestration technology. Gulf Coast Sequestration will transport the carbon dioxide and bury it deep within Calcasieu Parish land owned by Stream Companies. Both Gulf Coast Sequestration and Stream Companies are led by W. Gray Stream.
Heir to a large oil fortune (and son of country singer Lynn Anderson), William Gray Stream is a well known Louisiana business and land baron with heavy political ties. Bobby Jindal appointed him to the state Board of Regents in exchange for a $10,000 campaign contribution. He has also dabbled in the tech start-up world, having spent much of the past decade attempting to prop up the ill-fated Waitr food delivery app. Despite much cheerleading from the local press, that venture seems to have reached its ending last year.
But it's the land investment where Stream is positioning himself for the real windfall. The land holdings corporation he has inherited and the "wetlands recovery" business he owns are primed to receive federal subsidies for carbon capture and sequestration, as well as any future attempts to prop up the waning carbon offset market which seem all but inevitable. And so, in this way, federal funds ostensibly meant to fight climate change are just being sucked up... kind of like a giant vacuum.... by a politically connected Louisiana failson.
Meanwhile the Drowning State, under attack from an arsenal of Death Stars and carbon bombs remains in a state of drowning. And as Hurricane Season enters it peak, we may yet see another munition deployed.
The heat dome responsible for record-breaking temperatures and
drought in south Louisiana may have also created a ticking time bomb of
"ridiculously warm" waters in the northern Gulf of Mexico, which could
rapidly intensify any tropical storm approaching the state’s coastline,
scientists say.
As the peak of hurricane season approaches —
generally considered to be around Sept. 10 — conditions in the Gulf will
be a major focus of concern for storm trackers.
"All of the shallow waters, including the coastal waters and tidal
lakes, are ridiculously warm right now. So it’s primed for anything that
works its way in," said Ben Schott, director of the National Weather
Service office covering the New Orleans and Baton Rouge areas.
We got a look at this Hurricane Idalia rapidly intensified to a category 4 storm before making landfall in Florida last week. Hopefully we won't get to see the Gulf "time bomb" explode anything in our path this year. We're doing a fair enough job at blowing ourselves to bits as it is.
