At the very least he's favoring an ideological agenda and his own political ambition over any policy that could be reasonably explained as dictated by "tough times." At the same time, and as a direct result of Jindal's ideological grasping, the Governor is also favoring the private education and private health care interests who benefit directly from these transfers of public resources.
So Jindal is clearly showing favoritism with his policy agenda. And since these decisions are right in line with his continuing national political ambitions, they are in no way "tough decisions" for him to be making. I realize Clancy may feel compelled to include this language in order to give his article an element of "In fairness to Jindal..." or whatever but it's very much off the mark in this case.
I've yet to figure out why anyone takes DuBos seriously.
ReplyDelete