Yesterday Garret Graves suggested that the state should
sue the Army Corps of Engineers and leave oil and gas alone.
In criticizing the suit, though, Graves laid more of the blame for
coastal damage on the corps, arguing that the Mississippi River levees
and other corps projects were more to blame for coastal damage than oil
and gas companies.
“If you’re worried about coastal restoration,
if you’re worried about the sustainability of this area, I wonder why
you’re worried about a scrape on a heart-attack patient,” he said.
Here's the new definition of scrape.
"What is so tragic about the oil and gas industry’s approach to this —
and the state’s sort of callous disregard, I mean complete negligence —
was that there were answers,” says Tulane environmental law professor Oliver Houck.
“They could have avoided the dredging, they could have immediately
repaired the dredging following — they didn’t do either. Having made
very sure the state wouldn’t touch them, they turned around and said,
‘Hey, the state never touched us.’ Well, come on — the state is just as
complicit in the oil and gas damage as the industry is.”
The
dredging would eventually slow down because the oil and gas fields under
the wetlands were playing out and the action was moving offshore, where
4,000 rigs would eventually be planted off the state’s coast.
But
the damage had been done. Of the nearly 2000 miles of coastal wetlands
lost between the 1930s and 2010, researchers say anywhere from 30 to 90
percent can be traced to actions by the oil and gas industry.
“I’m comfortable with up to 90 percent,” says LSU researcher Gene Turner. He says for every acre of canal dredged, there is another five to seven acres of wetland that is lost.
That's a mighty sharp tool they used to scrape out those oil field canals. It's not often that a scrape takes
thousands of years off the patient's life.
The government built levees to protect communities from
Mississippi River floods. It built jetties at the
river's mouth to prevent sandbars from forming and
blocking shipping traffic. Those projects worked, but they
also accelerated land loss by cutting off sediment flow to
the wetlands that once kept pace with subsidence, the
natural sinking of soft marsh soils.
Still, the Louisiana coast might have survived another
1,000 years or more, Louisiana State University scientists
said. But the discovery of oil and gas compressed its
destruction into a half-century.
By the 1980s, the petroleum industry and the corps had
dredged more than 20,000 miles of canals and new navigation
channels from the coast inland across the wetlands. The new
web of waterways, like a circulatory system pumping poison,
injected saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico into
salt-sensitive freshwater wetlands. Fueled by the advance of
big business on the coast, the Gulf's slow march
northward accelerated into a sprint.
But then they tell us we're entering the post-antibiotic era of medicine. Maybe a scrape really is a deadly cut. nowadays.
1 comment:
I am amazed no one has called Graves on this BS. This alleged foe of frivolous lawsuits is suggesting that the state sue the federal government over the levees, when by federal statute the federal government is immune from any liability for any damages caused by flood control projects.
He's bullshitting everyone, and no one is noticing it.
Post a Comment